Legal Opinion

Martindale v. Tibbetts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1861PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from the Delaware Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was a suit originally commenced by Sophronia Tibbetts against the appellant, on a note and mortgage executed by Martindale to tbe said Sophronia, in *201her maiden name of Sophronia Scantling, alleging lier subsequent intermarriage with Isaac Tibbetts. The complaint was demurred to for the non-joinder of the husband, as party plaintiff. This demurrer was sustained; the complaint was amended, and the husband . made a party plaintiff. The complaint was then, demurred to for a misjoinder of parties plaintiff, viz., for the joinder of the husband as a party. • The defendant seems to have been…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. FlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hall v. KincaidIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. City of New Albany v. LinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Bellows v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API