Legal Opinion
In Re Adoption of Ark. Sup. Ct. Admin. Order No. 23
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 6, 2024PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
2024 Ark. 109
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered: June 6, 2024 IN RE ADOPTION OF ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 23 PER CURIAM Pursuant to Amendment 80, section 4 of the Arkansas Constitution, the Supreme Court of Arkansas establishes Administrative Order No. 23 to clarify the inherent authority of judges to control security in their courtrooms.1 Administrative Order No. 23 — Courtroom Security All judges shall have the inherent authority to control security in their courtrooms. This includes the authority to establish rules for the safety of all who are present…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chris P. Corbitt, Esq. Robert Steinbuch, Esq. And Ben Motal, Esq., on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Pulaski County Circuit Court Eric Higgins, in His Official Capacity as Pulaski County Sheriff And Barry Hyde, in His Official Capacity as Pulaski County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
3Cited by2 opinions
- David Scott Taylor v. Rick Ferguson; Paradise Valley, LLC; Waterview Meadows, LLC; Waterview Estates, LLC; Waterview Estates Phase III, LLC; Aff Holdings, LLC; And Waterview Estates Phase Vi & Vii, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025
- City of Bauxite, Arkansas v. Arkansas Local Police and Fire Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026