Legal Opinion

Mortenson v. Bergthold

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1902No. 11,331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court for Cuming county. Tried below before Evans, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Hastings, C.

There are thirteen assignments of error in this case, but in reality the errors complained of are three: First, error of the trial court in instructing a verdict for plaintiff below, defendant here; second, error of the trial court in rejecting as evidence Exhibit 10 of defendants at the trial, the record of a so-called final settlement of the defendant administrator, Schmela, in 1887; and, third, error in overruling defendant’s objection to any evidence in the court below, because the petition showed an action barred by the statute of limitations. Unless the record discloses…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sjoli v. HogensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. In Re Manikowske's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API