Hudson v. Feige

The controversy in this suit is stated in 58 Mich. 148, by Justice Sherwood, in his opinion filed when the case was here before.

*143The claim of the plaintiff is for driving logs for the defendant, put afloat in the Chippewa river in 1883; which logs were hard-wood, and marked “ Diamond F.” He also sued upon the claim of one Curry, assigned to him, for driving hard-wood logs in the same river, put afloat therein by the ■defendant in 1882, and marked “ E. F. E.” For the driving of these logs he and Curry were to receive each 20 cents per 1,000 feet.

The defendant claims that Curry abandoned his…