Legal Opinion

Recon Car Corp. v. Chrysler Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur W. Lonschein, J.

This is an application to justify a surety.

Defendant Chrysler Corporation has taken an appeal from a verdict against it, in favor of Recon Car Corp. of New York, in excess of one million dollars. It has filed an undertaking on appeal (CPLR 5519 [a] [2]) which was executed by the Chrysler Insurance Company, as surety. The plaintiff objected to the identity of the surety.

It is undisputed that Chrysler Insurance Company, while having an independent corporate existence, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the defendant Chrysler Corporation. It is further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alex v. GrandeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Nichols v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Kreitzer v. ChamiklesNew York Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Recon Car Corp. v. Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Aetna Casualty. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API