Legal Opinion
California State Employees' Ass'n v. California Public Employees' Retirement System Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 2003No. C042192PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
Article XVI, section 17 of the state Constitution prohibits the Legislature from enacting, without a ratifying vote of the electorate, changes in the number, terms and methods of selecting employee members of a public employee retirement system’s governing board. The trial court below concluded the constitutional provision also applied to amendments adopted by the retirement system’s governing board to its regulations establishing procedures for elections required to be held for selecting employee board members. The court granted a petition for writ of mandate ordering a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Nickelsberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Allen v. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Modesto Irrigation District v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Amalgamated Transit Union v. San Joaqu (In re in Reg'l Transit Dist.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Amalgamated Transit Union v. San Joaquin Reg. Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Amalgamated Transit Union v. San Joaquin Reg. Transit Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019