Legal Opinion

Cornman v. Conway

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 27, 1933No. 32518PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The supervisor of public accounts has appealed from a judgment enjoining the agents of the supervisor from confiscating and selling the plaintiff’s automobile, which was seized under authority of the second paragraph of section 6 of Act No. 34 of 1930, pp. 78, 85.

The object of the statute, as declared in its title, is to provide revenue for public edu cation, by levying a tax on malt extract and derivatives or combinations thereof. The tax is 3 cents on every pound, or fraction of a pound, of malt extract, and derivatives or combinations thereof, handled, sold, or _…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. McMillen v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Steiner v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  4. Finance SEC. Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ManuelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. State v. SpoonerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  4. State v. 1971 Green GMC VanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  5. State v. RicksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API