Williams v. Perez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants have established prima facie that plaintiff Lawrence Williams did not sustain a serious injury of a permanent nature. However, plaintiffs have submitted medical evidence in admissible form, including affirmations of two treating orthopedists, both of whom performed surgical procedures on plaintiff Lawrence Williams within the year following his accident and both of whom performed specific range of motion tests before and after the surgeries. This evidence raises triable issues as to permanent significant or consequential limitations caused by the accident.
Defendants have submitted,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Linton v. NawazNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Lee Yuen v. Arka Memory Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Spencer v. Golden Eagle, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Linton v. NawazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pakeman v. KarekeziaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Pinzon v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Calcano v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sylla v. Brickyard Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Zambrana v. TimothyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.