Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1902PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Clay Chancery Court. Edward D. Robertson, Chancellor. The ten-year statute of limitation has been repealed. Acts 1889, p. 87. Appellee’s claim was barred. 65 S. W. 103; 65 S. W. 125.

1Opinion of the CourtRiddick, J.

This is an action brought by the Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Company against D. M. Simpson and wife to foreclose a mortgage. The mortgage was executed on the 3d day of March,. 1891, to secure a promissory note of same date for $611, due and payable on or before the 3d day of March, 1892, and the action to foreclose was brought on the 1st day of August, 1899. The defendants filed an answer setting up the statute of limitations as a defense to the action. The record recites that the case was heard in the chancery court upon the complaint, mortgage, note and the answer of the defendants. The court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watkins v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clarke v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Johnson v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Clark v. LesserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Taylor v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Torrey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API