Legal Opinion · Dissent
McQuaid v. Oakland County Board of County Auditors
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1946No. Docket No. 92, Calendar No. 43,374Published
1DissentButzel, C. J.
The judgment should be reversed. I do not believe that the claim of plaintiff can in any sense be considered a just or a legal claim chargeable against the county of Oakland.
Section 1211, 1 Comp. Laws 1929 (Stat. Ann. § 5.559), provides in part: *
‘ ‘ The said board shall have power, and it is hereby expressly authorized and directed:
“First, To audit all claims wMch are chargeable against the said county, as in section 8 above provided, and to draw warrants therefor, duly signed by its chairman and countersigned by the clerk; but no warrant shall be drawn or issued by said board except for the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cramer v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. McGaughey v. GraystonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Wimberly v. DeaconSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Carpenter v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Indiana Unemployment Compensation Board v. Benner-Coryell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.