Legal Opinion · Dissent

McQuaid v. Oakland County Board of County Auditors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1946No. Docket No. 92, Calendar No. 43,374Published

1DissentButzel, C. J.

The judgment should be reversed. I do not believe that the claim of plaintiff can in any sense be considered a just or a legal claim chargeable against the county of Oakland.

Section 1211, 1 Comp. Laws 1929 (Stat. Ann. § 5.559), provides in part: *

‘ ‘ The said board shall have power, and it is hereby expressly authorized and directed:

“First, To audit all claims wMch are chargeable against the said county, as in section 8 above provided, and to draw warrants therefor, duly signed by its chairman and countersigned by the clerk; but no warrant shall be drawn or issued by said board except for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cramer v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State Ex Rel. McGaughey v. GraystonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Wimberly v. DeaconSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Carpenter v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Indiana Unemployment Compensation Board v. Benner-Coryell Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API