Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Warner, Quinlan Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 13, 1934PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The respondent has excepted to the libel on the ground that the cause of ac tion set forth in it is not within the jurisdiction of a court of admiralty.
The libel is for breach of contract to sell to the libelants, who operated steamships, all their fuel oil requirements for one year. Under the contract the respondent undertook to sell and deliver the oil to the libelants’ steamships in New York .Harbor. It is charged that the respondent refused to supply oil ordered for one of the steamships, and that the libelants were obliged to purchase oil elsewhere at a higher…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- The J. E. RumbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The ElectronDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1891
- Steamship Overdale Co. v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. LeithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Dolco Investments, Ltd. v. Moonriver Development, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- ProShipLine, Inc. v. Aspen Infrastructures, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Compania Argentina De Navegacion Dodero v. Atlas Maritime Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- The YankeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.