Legal Opinion

Golden v. Popper Shoe Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 17, 1950No. Civ. No. 8686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

This is an action for breach of contract' brought by plaintiff, Robert E. Golden, a citizen of Massachusetts, doing business in Boston under the name of “Robert’s Shoes” against the Popper Shoe Corpn., a Maryland corporation doing business in Massachusetts, where it sells shoes at retail on the premises of a Boston department store known as “Raymond’s.” Defendant has moved for summary judgment.

The facts appear from the pleadings, answers of both parties to interrogatories, and the deposition of plaintiff. The following facts appear to be undisputed. Golden operates a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McClintic-Marshall Co. v. FreedmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Hodgens v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Vincent Co. v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Assets Service Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Vincent Company v. First National Supermarkets, Inc., 84-4231 (1995)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API