Legal Opinion

Williams v. Beazley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 19, 1830PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Chancery ■ , Case 160. Error to the Garrard Circuit; John L. Bridges, Judge. Fraud, Purchaser. Seller. Supprcssio veri. Parol evidence. Commonwealth's paper.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Underwood

delivered the opinion.of the Court.

Beazley purchased from Williams a tract of land, and executed two notes for $1000 each, in part payment therefor. On the day the deed conveying the land was executed, Beazley drew two notes for $1000 each, payable in notes on the bank of the commonwealth, and oflereiihem to Williams, who refused to accept them, unfSs they were made *578payable in dollars, without any addition. Beazley, fays one of (he witnesses, positively refused to give his note in that way. Williams assured him, if he would give his notes payable in dollars, he, Williams, would…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. BertigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Akers v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Venable v. BradburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API