Boyd v. Grinker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Petitioner maintains for the first time in this proceeding *287that respondents failed to provide her with adequate notice as to the grounds for the denial of her request for emergency assistance to pay rent arrears (Social Services Law § 350-j). As this issue was not before the agency, it has not been preserved for review by this court (Matter of Moschella v Romano, 110 AD2d 702). Nevertheless, there is no merit to this due process argument as petitioner received a "notice of non-acceptance” informing her that the denial of benefits was due to her "failure to submit requested documents: (1) to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baumes v. LavineNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Schevchik v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Moschella v. RomanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Shelton v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988