Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Grinker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioner maintains for the first time in this proceeding *287that respondents failed to provide her with adequate notice as to the grounds for the denial of her request for emergency assistance to pay rent arrears (Social Services Law § 350-j). As this issue was not before the agency, it has not been preserved for review by this court (Matter of Moschella v Romano, 110 AD2d 702). Nevertheless, there is no merit to this due process argument as petitioner received a "notice of non-acceptance” informing her that the denial of benefits was due to her "failure to submit requested documents: (1) to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baumes v. LavineNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Schevchik v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Moschella v. RomanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Shelton v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API