Legal Opinion
Beckwith v. Malleable Iron Range Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 7, 1912Published
In Equity. Suit by Arthur K. Beckwith against the Malleable Iron Range Company.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
This matter comes up on a certificate of the master for instructions in respect to a patent accounting, for infringement of a patent sustained in (C. C.) 174 Fed. 1001; (C. C. A.) 189 Fed. 74.
*292Complainant.having a decree for profits and damages, the case was referred to a master:
“To ascertain, take and state, and report to tbe court, an account of the number of ranges embodying said invention and improvement * * * made, used, and sold by the defendant, and also the gains, profits, and advantages which the defendant has received, or have arisen or accrued to it, since…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- McCreary v. Pennsylvania Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Columbia Wire Co. v. Kokomo Steel & Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
- Brown v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.