Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hernandez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 11, 1991No. D 13-837; CA A68180PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Husband appeals a trial court order vacating the renewal of a judgment. He argues that the trial court erred in holding that his judgment expired by operation of law because of the passage of time. We affirm.

The parties were divorced in 1979. The judgment awarded wife the family home and gave husband an $18,000 “judgment lien” against the property, payable ten years after entry of the judgment, one year after wife’s remarriage, or upon wife’s death, whichever came first. By 1989, ten years after the judgment was entered, wife had not remarried and she still owned the home. On October 12,1990,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Spady v. GravesOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hansen v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Hovden v. HovdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marriage of Hernandez v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Weber v. GaltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API