Legal Opinion

Veigel v. O'Toole

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1931No. Nos. 28,386, 28,387PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from an order denying a new trial after findings in favor of plaintiff.

There is no substantial dispute as to the facts involved. On May 22, 1917, defendants O’Toole and wife let by written lease to Frank A. Saméis the front corner room of a building upon a certain lot in South St. Paul, Minnesota, for the term of 30 years from September 1, 1917, for the yearly rent of $2,100 during the first ten years, $3,000 a year for ten years thereafter, and $3,600 a year for the last ten years of the term, the rent to be payable in equal monthly instalments in advance. The leased premises…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Battelle v. Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. McArthur v. Times Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Morgan v. . Bon Bon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Kirkup v. Anaconda Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Lake Harriet State Bank v. VenieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Almac, Inc. v. JRH Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API