Legal Opinion
Fortune v. Parks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 14, 1911No. 1097PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from District Court, Caddo County; G. 'A. Brown, Judge. Action between C. C. Fortune and F. W. Parks and others. From the judgment, Fortune brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The plaintiff in error seeks to review the judgment o’f the lower court upon a transcript. The certificate of the clerk is as follows:
“I, Clyde C. Leach, clerk of the district court' in and for Caddo county, Oklahoma, hereby certify the foregoing to be true, complete and correct copy of amended petition, amended answer. motion for judgment' on pleadings, motion for new trial, J. E.. on motion, motion for second trial, J. E. on motion, in cause No. 978. Parks et al. v. Fortune, as the same appears on file and of record in said court. In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wade v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Whitney v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Neiswender v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Westbrook v. SchmausSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Eckert v. McBeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Martin v. MilnorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Manley v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- E. G. Rall Grain Co. v. First State Bank of McQueenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Champion Oil Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.