Legal Opinion
Castro v. Serrata
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 30, 2001No. Civ.A. L-98-103PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KAZEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is Defendant Rick Day’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiffs Crisoforo Castro and Yolanda Castro, Individually and as Next Friends of Lorena Castro, Magnolia Castro, Christian Castro, and Jose Armando Castro, Minors. This Court entered an order granting summary judgment in part and denying it in part on September 15, 2000 (Docket No. 77). Plaintiffs claim of “negligent hiring” by the Defendant is the only cause of action that remains.
Matías Serrata was an independent contractor hired by Defendant Day to install a ranch fence.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phillip Hess v. Upper Mississippi Towing Corp. And Penlatex Barge Lines, Inc., Defendants- Fidelity & Casualty Co. Of New York, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Pollard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- Cephas E. Sword and Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Intervener v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Gray v. Baker & Taylor Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Hammack v. Conoco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hancock v. Mayor & Cty. Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Hauptman v. WMC, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- Urena v. Capano Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Dye v. WMC, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Castro v. Angela V Morales EstCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.