Legal Opinion
Complaint of American Export Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 16, 1977No. 73 Civ. 2507 (CHT)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TENNEY, District Judge.
In the now four-year-old litigation arising from the collision between the S/S c.v. SEA WITCH and the S/S ESSO BRUSSELS in New York Harbor on June 2, 1973, three new procedural motions have been submitted to the Court. Movants are Bath Iron Works Corporation (“Bath”), third-party defendant; Sperry Rand Corporation (“Sperry”), claimant and third-party defendant; and Esso Belgium, Standard Tankers (Bahamas) Company Limited and Exxon Corporation (“Exxon Group”), claimants, all of whom request leave to amend pleadings and assert cross-claims against the United States…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- British Transport Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company, a Corp. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Complaint of American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985