Bingham v. Bradley
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN. DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. The facts, which involve the validity of an order of an United States Commissioner holding a person for extradition under the Treaties of 1842 and 1889 with Great Britain, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
This is an appeal from a final order of the District Court denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus in an extradition case. The facts are to be gathered from the petition for the writ and the exhibits therein referred to and made a part of it, which include a sworn complaint by the British Consul General at Chicago, applying on behalf of the Government of the Dominion of Canada for the extradition of appellant to Montreal, certain ex parte affidavits taken in Montreal and a complaint made and warrant issued against appellant in that city, an abstract of the oral testimony taken…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glucksman v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- McNamara v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Rice v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Yordi v. NolteSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
3Cited by74 opinions
- Fernandez v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Factor v. LaubenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Skaftouros v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Samuel Shapiro v. Thomas E. Ferrandina, United States Marshal for the Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Gaspar Eugenio Jimenez Escobedo v. United States of America, Gustavo Castillo v. Donald D. Forsht, U. S. MarshalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.