Legal Opinion

SUNIK v. COMMISSIONER

United States Tax Court

Decided July 27, 2001No. 9941-99Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MARK SUNIK AND TAMARA SUNIK, Petitioners v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

SUNIK v. COMMISSIONER

No. 9941-99

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2001-195; 2001 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 228; 82 T.C.M. (CCH) 333;

July 27, 2001, Filed

Decision will be entered for respondent.

Jay J. Freireich, Harvey R. Poe, and Michael J. Sullivan, for

petitioners.

Keith V. Doce and Diane R. Mirabito, for respondent.

Wells, Thomas B.

WELLS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WELLS, CHIEF JUDGE: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' 1995 Federal income tax in the amount of $ 70,783 and a section 6662 accuracy-related…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. HIGBEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEUnited States Tax Court · 2001
  3. Howard S. Scar and Ethel M. Scar v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Raul Llorente v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  5. Llorente v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API