Cushman v. New York Central Railroad

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, and findings modified as indicated in our decision in Moenig v. New York Central Railroad Co. (187 App. Div. 323). The only substantial point of difference between this ease and the Moenig case, decided herewith, is that the deed of conveyance of the property known as the depot property is a quitclaim instead of a warranty deed, and, therefore; the fine of reasoning used in the Moenig case, which is based upon the fact that in that case the conveyance of the depot property by warranty deed, is not applicable to the case at bar. But this quitclaim…