Legal Opinion

Klemme v. Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1980No. Civ. 20734PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

This appeal raises the question, said to be a recurring problem in the trial courts, whether in a negligence action involving multiple defendants, the trial court may, at the plaintiff’s request and over the defendants’ objections, direct the jury to apportion comparative fault among the defendants by special verdict. We conclude that it may not and that the trial court in the case at bench erred in requiring the jury to apportion fault among the defendants and an “other” nonparty. The more difficult question is whether the error was prejudicial requiring reversal of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. County of Riverside v. Loma Linda UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Barron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Greshko v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Shepard & Morgan v. Lee & Daniel, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API