Legal Opinion

State v. Howley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 16, 1988No. 87-NB-1155; CA A47416PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s conviction for harassment was reversed by this court for lack of evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and the cause remanded for a new trial. State v. Howley, 92 Or App 575, 758 P2d 893 (1988). On motion for reconsideration, defendant argues that a retrial in this case is prohibited by the former jeopardy provisions of ORS 131.515; Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution; and the Fifth Amendment. The granting of a new trial after a judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence violates the principles of former jeopardy, whether the judgment of acquittal is rendered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. HowleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SaudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. HowleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API