Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 11, 1996No. 85635PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review the following question passed upon by the First District Court of Appeal and certified to be of great public importance:

WHETHER THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MAY BE HELD LIABLE AS A RESULT OF THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF AN ESCAPED PRISONER?

Department of Corrections v. Burnett, 653 So.2d 1102, 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We recently answered the identical question in Vann v. Department of Corrections, 662 So.2d 339 (Fla.1995), in the negative by holding the Department of Corrections “could not be held liable for the criminal acts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vann v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Department of Corrections v. BurnettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dept. of Environ. Protection v. MillenderSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. State, Department of Highway Patrol v. PollackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAY PATROL v. PollackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API