A. Weinfield, Inc. v. Ferd. S. Kaufman, Inc.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ST. PAUL, J..
Plaintiff sued for the appointment of a receiver for defendant. Defendant confessed judgment, and a receiver was appointed.
Certain orders were issued at the reguest of the receiver, which are not pertinent here.
Within ten days after the judgment appointing the receiver, the Robert Hat Company, claiming by affidavit to have an interest, took an appeal from said judgment, all in accordance With Act No. 159 of 1898, § 4. The appellant directed the clerk to put into the transcript of appeal only such parts of the record below as related to the judgment appointing the receiver, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Union Garment Co. v. NewburgerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Immanuel Presbyterian Church v. RiedySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Duplantis v. LocascioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Foster v. F. H. Koretke Brass & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1941