Legal Opinion
Adum v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 4, 2014No. ED 99909PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge.
The St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department (“the SLMPD”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting Arbab Adum’s (“Adum”) petition for expungement. The SLMPD argues the trial court erred in granting Adum’s petition to expunge because Adum failed as a matter of law to prove his arrest was based on false information and failed to prove there was no probable cause at the time of the petition to expunge to believe he committed the offense as required by Section 610.122. We reverse.
*328After an altercation between Adum and the victim, his wife, the police…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martinez v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Coleman v. Missouri State Criminal Records RepositoryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Rozier v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Schollmeyer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Doe, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Missouri State Highway Patrol Criminal Records Repository, and City of University CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Lauren Elaine Sutton v. Municipal Court Division, Des Peres, and Missouri State Highway Patrol Criminal Records RepositoryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Trapani v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Trapani v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017