Legal Opinion

Howell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1986No. 6-86-038-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BLEIL, Justice.

Jack Howell and his wife, Dianna Howell, appeal from their conviction for violating the compulsory school attendance law. The Howells represent themselves in this appeal, as they did at trial. Although the points of error raised by the Howells are inartfully expressed, their principal argument appears to be that they are exempted from compliance with the compulsory school attendance law under the United States and Texas Constitutions. We conclude otherwise and affirm.

Dianna Howell has two children by a previous marriage, Tony Sustaire and Far-rah Sustaire. The children are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Faith Baptist ChurchNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DeLaBruereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API