Legal Opinion

Hugg v. Baltimore & Cuba Smelting & Mining Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 19, 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The facts are given in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.

This suit was instituted to recover a sum claimed to be due the appellant’s intestate, for contribution in general average, under a contract of affreightment.

The original shipment by charter-party, was of a cargo of copper ore, six hundred and seventy-nine tons, on board the *420Maggie V. Hugg, a vessel belonging to the appellant’s intestate, from Taltal, in Chili, to the port of Baltimore, at a freight of ¿£3. 10s. per ton. The contract contained the usual exception of the dangers and accidents of the seas. After encountering rough weather, it was discovered that the ship was leaking badly, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hugg v. Augusta Insurance and Banking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1849
  2. Lyon v. AlvordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Backus v. CoyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Murray v. Aetna Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1864
  3. Shoe v. CraigDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. The Plow CityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API