Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Reece

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1988No. 52665-6, 53565-5Published

1DissentUtter, J.

(dissenting) — The constitutional protection of free speech is one of the noblest and most courageous foundations of our nation and our state. It is sadly ironic that this protection is being used by those who would degrade our society. However, it is in the context of determining to protect speech that we find to be demeaning and repugnant that our true commitment to the doctrine is tested.

The gist of the majority's analysis is that, despite the explicit language of Const, art. 1, § 5, it does not protect expression that was the subject of a statute near the time of the ratification of our…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API