Kapena v. Kaleleonalani
Hawaii Supreme Court
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
Decision of
Judd, C.J.
The following is a simplified statement of the essential allegations in the bill:
I. Certain premises on Merchant street, in Honolulu, known as “Honolulu Hale,” as well as several other parcels of land described in the bill, were the property of Kamehameha IV. in his private capacity, and were not a part of the Royal Domain commonly known as Crown Lands, although they were erroneously understood and believed to be such and were so treated.
II. An Act of the Legislature passed January 3d, 1865, entitled “An Act to relieve the Royal Domain from encumbrances,” etc., authorized…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnes v. . MottNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Northrop's executors v. GravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Collins v. HoxieNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
- Black v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Jennings v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
3Cited by21 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pacific Rent-All, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Beneficial Hawaii, Inc. v. KidaHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Shimabuku v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Alamida v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- Industrial Indemnity Company v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.