Legal Opinion

In Re the Guardianship of Nelson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1996No. C5-95-2086PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Guardian appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for allocation of the social security income of his son.

FACTS

Blake Evert Nelson (Blake) receives approximately $786 monthly in social security survivor benefits due to his mother’s death. The Social Security Administration disburses the benefits to William G. Nelson (Nelson), Blake’s father and legal guardian, as Blake’s representative payee. Nelson petitioned the district court to allow him, as Blake’s guardian and representative payee, to use Blake’s social security benefits to pay for Blake’s food,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Pikop v. Burlington Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. McCampbell v. McCampbellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API