Legal Opinion

Texarkana Telephone Co. v. Burge

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1917No. 1730PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above) The appellant contends that the husband may not sue to recover damages for personal injuries to his wife, because under the present law such damages are the separate property of the wife. Article 1839 (Vernon’s Say les’ Stat.) provides that:

“The husband may sue either alone or jointly with his wife for the recovery of any separate property of the wife; and, in case he fail or neglect so to do, she may, by the authority of the court, sue for such property in her own name.” :

The effect of this statute is to constitute the husband the legal agent of the wife in…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barmore v. DarraghCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Shawver v. American Ry. Express Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Pullman Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Robinson Oil Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Griffith v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API