Legal Opinion

Dalmas v. Philipsburg & Susquehanna Valley Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1916No. Appeal, No. 33PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 33, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Clearfield Co., Sept. T., 1913, No. 3, in equity, dismissing bill in equity for specific performance, in case of Louis Dalmas v. Philips-burg & Susquehanna Valley Railroad Company, and First Mortgage Guarantee & Trust Company of Philadelphia. Bill in equity for specific performance. The facts appear in the following opinion of Whitehead, P. J., sur defendant’s demurrer to the bill.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 33, Jan. T., 1916, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Clearfield Co., Sept. T., 1913, No. 3, in equity, dismissing bill in equity for specific performance, in case of Louis Dalmas v. Philips-burg & Susquehanna Valley Railroad Company, and First Mortgage Guarantee & Trust Company of Philadelphia. Bill in equity for specific performance. The facts appear in the following opinion of Whitehead, P. J., sur defendant’s demurrer to the bill. This case has been argued by counsel for plaintiff and defendant as though the demurrer had been filed after the filing of the amended bill, and…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the court below sustaining the demurrer to plaintiff’s bill.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nice Ball Bearing Co. v. Mortgage Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Pennsylvania Utilities Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. D. N. Corporation v. RoudabushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Mezza v. Beiletti Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API