Legal Opinion

Golight, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant/third Party and North Arkansas Wholesale Company, Inc. v. Innovative International (h.k.) Ltd., Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 20, 2004No. 02-1608Published

1Opinion of the Court

355 F.3d 1327

GOLIGHT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and

North Arkansas Wholesale Company, Inc., Defendant,

v.

Innovative International (H.K.) Ltd., Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1608.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 20, 2004.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED David L. DeBruin, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, of Milwaukee, WI, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Matthew S. MacLean.

William D. Coston, Venable, Baetjer, Howard & Civiletti, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant/third party…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API