Siller v. Board of Supervisors
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying their petition for a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission of the City and County of San Francisco to set aside an order granting a building variance to Mason-Pine, Inc., the principal real party in interest, hereinafter sometimes called Mason-Pine.
As ground for reversal, plaintiffs contend that the record upon which the planning commission acted shows as a matter of law that the provisions of the planning code allowing variances have not been met; i.e., that in granting the subject variance the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- MTR. OFF SHORE REST. CORP. v. LindenNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lucas Valley Homeowners Assn. v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.