Legal Opinion

Siller v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1962No. S. F. 21109PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying their petition for a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission of the City and County of San Francisco to set aside an order granting a building variance to Mason-Pine, Inc., the principal real party in interest, hereinafter sometimes called Mason-Pine.

As ground for reversal, plaintiffs contend that the record upon which the planning commission acted shows as a matter of law that the provisions of the planning code allowing variances have not been met; i.e., that in granting the subject variance the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. MTR. OFF SHORE REST. CORP. v. LindenNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Lucas Valley Homeowners Assn. v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API