Legal Opinion

Wood v. Ludwig

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1820PublishedCited by 2 opinions

JN ERROR. ERROR to the District Court of the city and county of Philadelphia. This was a scire facias against Samuel Ludwig as garnishee of fames Parkinson, in a foreign attachment that had been issued against Parkinson.' Ludwig pleaded nulla bona, and on the trial of the sciré facias, after the plaintiff had proved a debt due by Ludwig to Parkinson, for goods sold ñnd delivered on the 27th July, 1817, to the amount of 288 dollars and 9 cents, on a credit of four months,…

Read the full summary

JN ERROR. ERROR to the District Court of the city and county of Philadelphia. This was a scire facias against Samuel Ludwig as garnishee of fames Parkinson, in a foreign attachment that had been issued against Parkinson.' Ludwig pleaded nulla bona, and on the trial of the sciré facias, after the plaintiff had proved a debt due by Ludwig to Parkinson, for goods sold ñnd delivered on the 27th July, 1817, to the amount of 288 dollars and 9 cents, on a credit of four months, Ludwig instantly paid that sum into Court, without intereát or costs, ant^ ^1611 °fferec^ himself as a witness, to prove…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Duncan J.

To this scire facias against the garnishee, in a foreign attachment, on which were attached all the effects and credits of James Parkinson, in the hands of Samuel Ludwig, the garnishee'pleaded nulla bona; and on the trial, the plaintiff gave evidence of goods sold and delivered, on a credit of four months, by James Parkinson to Samuel Ludwig amounting to $8 288 9 cts. The goods were sold on the 27th July, 1817. The garnishee instantly paid into Court the principal debt, without interest and without costs ; and he offered himself as a witness…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. THE SHIP RESOLUTION, AND INGERSOLLSupreme Court of the United States · 1781
  2. The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria v. LOUISA & MARIA SETONSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Embree & Collins v. HannaNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  4. Steele v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1811
  5. Myers v. UrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1801

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grimes v. BoothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
  2. Hall v. KnappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API