Crandall v. Irwin
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
Appellee made application for a rehearing on the ground that the petition was filed within the six-year limitation, although no service was had within 60 days thereafter. The rehearing is limited to this phase of the case.
It is appellee’s contention that Section 11279, General Code, is “determinative of how and when a civil action is brought under the Ohio Code of Civil Procedure.” It is true that Section 11279 provides how a civil action is commenced, but it does not prescribe the time of commencing a civil action.
This distinction will be readily apparent upon an examination of the Code of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rorick v. Devon Syndicate, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- Willes v. PalmerIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Pilgrim Distributing Corp. v. Galsworthy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Consumers Plumbing & Heating Supply Co. v. Chicago Pottery Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- Bakin, Admr. v. MartiOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Davis v. FoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.