Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Bridge & Scaffolds Corp. v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 2016No. 729 653507/13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered July 28, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the second and fourth causes of action insofar as they sought payment for extra maintenance work and in quantum meruit, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

The contractual notice of claim requirement in section 23 of the contract’s General Conditions is an express condition precedent to recovery and provides that claims are waived by the contractor’s failure to submit a sufficient notice (see Hi-Tech…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Promo-Pro Ltd. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Hi-Tech Constr. & Mgt. Servs. Inc. v. Housing Auth. of the City of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Universal Constr. Resources, Inc. v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. Matter of Intercontinental Constr. Contr., Inc. v. New York City Hous. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API