Bloom v. Bloom

(specially concurring).

Is the rule of law clear and it’s application plain? Or the rule of law uncertain and the application alone doubtful?

ISSUE ONE

Rule of law is clear and its application is plain. See, Satumini and Dixon cited in majority opinion.

ISSUES TWO AND THREE

Per these decisions (stare decisis), trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying an increase of child support: State of Kansas, ex rel. Adams v. Adams, 455 N.W.2d 227 (S.D.1990); Peterson v. Peterson, 434 N.W.2d 732, 734 (S.D.1989); Havens v. Henning, 418 N.W.2d 311 (S.D.1988); Guindon v. Guindon, 256 N.W.2d 894…