Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. M/V Destiny Panama

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 19, 2001No. 00-1690-CIVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JORDAN, District Judge.

As set forth below, the defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiffs’ jury demand [D.E. 40] is DENIED.

The defendants maintain that the plaintiffs’ jury demand must give way because the plaintiffs have elected to proceed under Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court’s admiralty jurisdiction. The plaintiffs respond by arguing that they are entitled to a jury trial by virtue of their Jones Act claim, and alternatively move for leave to amend their complaint to delete the Rule 9(h) election and add a statement expressly invoking federal question…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. T.N.T. Marine Service, Inc. v. Weaver Shipyards & Dry Docks, Inc., in Personam, and Against the Tug Ocean Wind, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in Rem.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Tyrone Powell v. Offshore Navigation, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Edward J. Romero v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Trident Maritime Agency, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Harris J. Doucet v. Wheless Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Kevin Wingerter v. Chester Quarry CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API