Legal Opinion

Pluto v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION DIV. OF REAL ESTATE

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 1989No. 88-1197PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

538 So.2d 539 (1989)

Thomas C. PLUTO and Kathleen M. Pluto, His Wife, Appellants,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, Appellee.

No. 88-1197.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 17, 1989.

Kenneth M. Meer of Infantino & Berman, Winter Park, for appellants.

Frederick H. Wilsen, Chief Staff Atty. for Dept. of Professional Regulation, Div. of Real Estate, Orlando, for appellee.

THREADGILL, Judge.

Appellants, Thomas Pluto and Kathleen Pluto, challenge the order of the Florida Real Estate Commission (Commission) suspending their licenses and imposing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION v. BernalSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Bernal v. DEPT. OF PROF. REGULATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bajrangi v. DEPT. OF BUSINESS REG.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Hambley v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION, DIV. OF REAL ESTATEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. O'Connor v. Dept. of Pro. Regulation, Const. Industry Licensing Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Escobar v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of MedicineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Fowler v. Department of Health, Board of OptometryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API