Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Foley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1983No. 2-83-036-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JORDAN, Justice.

The question for decision on this appeal is whether, under the facts recited herein, appellants, all of whom are licensed real estate salespersons, are entitled to recover from the Real Estate Recovery Fund established pursuant to TEX.REV.CIV.STAT. ANN. art. 6573a, sec. 8 (Vernon Supp.1982-1983) (Real Estate Act). The pertinent section of this Act provides, generally, that the fund shall be used for the reimbursement of “aggrieved persons” who suffer monetary damages due to acts committed by licensed real estate brokers or salesmen, provided that the act was performed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry S. Miller Co. v. Treo EnterprisesTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Eberman v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Texas Real Estate Commission v. Century 21 Security Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Middelsteadt v. KarpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Buccella v. MayoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Texas Real Estate Commission v. Gilbert Rodriguez and Mary Alice Rodriguez And Carol Kilby, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API