Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 19, 1979No. 58188; 58189PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

Both defendants appeal their convictions in a joint trial for the possession of marijuana, and defendant Scott her conviction for the sale of marijuana. Held:

1. Error is claimed because the trial court denied defendants’ motion for a continuance because of their attorney’s illness. The record shows that after defendants were indicted they employed an attorney to represent them who withdrew before trial because he had not received his fee. Defendants had applied for and had been denied indigent status and were told by the court two weeks before trial to get a lawyer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLendon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Clarke v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Burnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Keen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Everman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Adams v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API