Legal Opinion

Hill v. Williamsport Police Dept.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 16, 2003No. 01-4530PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Kenneth Hill contends on appeal that the District Court abused its discretion when it refused to grant him a default judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Williamsport, Pennsylvania, the Williamsport Police Department, and Officer Michael Hoover. Because we must follow our Court’s precedent in Chamberlain v. Giampapa, 210 F.3d 154, 164 (3d Cir.2000), and because Hill has not shown that the District Court abused its discretion in following Chamberlain’s three-part test, we affirm.

I

On March 16, 1998, a Williamsport police officer arrested Hill…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Robin Chamberlain v. Vincent C. Giampapa, M.D., Individually and Dba Plastic Surgery Center InternationaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency. Appeal of Gary GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. YakubetsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union Local 32 BJ v. ShamrockClean, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Sharp v. Kean UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  4. Sentry Select Insurance v. LBL Skysystems (U.S.A), Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. PerlmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API