Legal Opinion

Dye v. McIntyre Floral Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This suit is brought by employees of defendant company for an alleged deficiency in wages paid them, on the ■theory that they are entitled to the benefits of the “Fair Labor Standards Act” of 1938', being Title 29, section 201, et seq., of the U. S. C. A. The chancellor sustained a demurrer raising the defense that the complainants were employed in agriculture and engaged in handling “agricultural or horticultural commodities for market;” that being so employed they are excluded from the act by its exempting provisions.

The act expressly excludes, “any employee employed in agriculture.”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ginn v. Forest Nursery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hein v. LudwigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Guerrero v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Wertheimer Bag Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Dost v. Pevely Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Jordan v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1942
  4. Kansas City v. Rosehill Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. Brewer v. Central Greenhouse Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API