In re Jennings
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeneoot, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 23 of appellants’ application for a patent.
No claims' were allowed by the Primary Examiner, but on appeal he was reversed with respect to claims 10, 11, 12, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, *888and 2G, and these claims stand allowed. All of the allowed claims are method claims.
Before us appellants have moved to dismiss the appeal as to claims 18 and 23, which motion will be granted.
Of the claims before us for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Anraku v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- In re FullamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- American Type Founders, Inc. v. Dexter Folder Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Application of EianeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951