In re Barnett
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from an ordér allowing costs to the relator (See 52 How., 73).
1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.
The question presented by this appeal is, whether the petitioner is entitled to costs because, as insisted, this is a special proceeding, and therefore within the provi*248sions of the act of the legislature passed in 1854 (Lams 1854, p. 593, sec. 3), which declared that costs may be allowed in the discretion of the court in special proceedings, and when so allowed shall be at the rate allowed for similar proceedings in civil actions. The learned justice who disposed of this matter thought costs should be awarded the petitioners, and allowed them. The respondent below appeals.
There is no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rensselaer Saratoga R.R. Co. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- People ex rel. Clute v. BoardmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- People ex rel. Van Rensselaer v. Van AlstyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- In re the Extension of BoweryNew York Supreme Court · 1856