Legal Opinion

Baykeeper, Inc. v. Suffolk County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review Resolution No. 1244-2002 of the Suffolk County Legislature, which, upon determining that the extension of a 2002 Vector Control Plan into the year 2003 constituted a Type II action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art 8), approved the extension, and an action, inter alia, to enjoin the Suffolk County Department of Public Works, Division of Vector Control, from performing work under the 2002 Vector Control Plan in 2003, Suffolk County, the Suffolk County Legislature, Suffolk County Council on Environmental…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. DiMauro v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Many v. Village of Sharon Springs Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Schulz v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Mastrangelo v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garrick v. TomlinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Peconic Baykeeper, Inc. v. Suffolk CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API